In this comparison, Ford Explorer stays competitive across the board, while the Renault Megane leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Choose the Renault Megane if...
Our take
The Renault Megane wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Techno 67kWh
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 | £31,995 (better) |
| Official range | 273 miles | 306 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 470 L (better) | 440 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.6 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,200 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm | 1,768 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm | 2,017 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,505 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m | 10.4 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare | 632 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L (better) | 440 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L (better) | 1332 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Explorer
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Renault Megane
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | Renault Megane Techno 67kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.20m-268mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.77m-104mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.02m-46mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.50m-125mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.69m-82mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L (better) | 440L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L (better) | 1332L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m | 10.4m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg | 1,772kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 67kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 306 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW | 165kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 | £31,995 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £28,245 (-£3,750) (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Hatchback |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles | 306 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 255 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW | 165 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 67 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Standard (better) |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.6 sec (better) |
| Power | 140 kW | 160 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 300 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | Not available |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Renault Megane
Techno 67kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Renault Megane
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Explorer
No active listings.
Renault Megane
The Ford Explorer costs £3,190 more than the Renault Megane. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The Renault Megane is not just cheaper - it also offers 33 miles more WLTP range and 60 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Renault Megane comes out ahead overall.
The Renault Megane is £3,190 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Renault Megane comes out roughly £3,310 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 255 miles for the Renault Megane - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Renault Megane goes roughly 71 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-25 minutes.
The Renault Megane is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 104 mm narrower than the Ford Explorer. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 632 mm of total clearance for the Renault Megane and about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer. The Renault Megane also turns in a 0.5 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 90% for the Renault Megane. That gives the Renault Megane a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Renault Megane's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Ford Explorer's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Renault Megane comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Renault Megane E-Tech buyer’s guide: optimum charge vs comfort range, heat pump by trim, warranty left, real-world range, owner-reported faults, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .