In this comparison, Ford E-Tourneo Courier counters with the lowest price, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Best value
Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossRange & charging
Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossPracticality
Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossChoose the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross if...
Our take
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
E-TECH 220ch
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossE-TECH 220ch |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,690 (better) | £47,000 |
| Official range | 196 miles | 373 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 570 L (better) | 545 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 35 min | 30 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 11 sec | 8.4 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossE-TECH 220ch |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,337 mm | 4,470 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,876 mm | 1,863 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,817 mm | 1,571 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.7 m | 10.4 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 524 mm spare | 537 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossE-TECH 220ch |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 4 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 570 L (better) | 545 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1670 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford E-Tourneo Courier
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
| Specification | Ford E-Tourneo Courier Titanium | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross E-TECH 220ch |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.34m | 4.47m+133mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.86m-13mm |
| Height | 1.82m | 1.57m-246mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.69m | 2.79m+93mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 570L (better) | 545L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1670L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.7m | 10.4m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,724kg (better) | 1,853kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46kWh | 87kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 196 mi | 373 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,690 (better) | £47,000 |
| Price after EV grant | £29,940 (-£3,750) | £47,000 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | MPV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossE-TECH 220ch |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 196 miles | 373 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 163 miles | 311 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 35 min | 30 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 43.6 kWh | 87 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossE-TECH 220ch |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 11 sec | 8.4 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW | 160 kW (better) |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 300 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Ford E-Tourneo Courier
Titanium

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
E-TECH 220ch
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossE-TECH 220ch |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Ford E-Tourneo Courier
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross costs £13,310 more than the Ford E-Tourneo Courier. For that premium it adds 176 miles more WLTP range, 50 kW faster peak rapid charging and 60 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross comes out ahead overall.
The Ford E-Tourneo Courier is £13,310 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford E-Tourneo Courier comes out roughly £13,310 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 163 miles for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and 311 miles for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross goes roughly 147 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-35 minutes.
The two are within 13 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 537 mm of total clearance for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross and about 524 mm of total clearance for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and 84% for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford E-Tourneo Courier comparisons
More Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .