In this comparison, BYD ATTO 3 leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality, while the MG IM5 stays competitive across the board.
Choose the BYD ATTO 3 if...
Our take
The BYD ATTO 3 wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
EVO Design RWD
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £38,990 (better) | £39,450 |
| Official range | 317 miles (better) | 304 miles |
| Boot space | 440 L | 457 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 35 min (better) | 65 min |
| 0-62 mph | 5.5 sec (better) | 6.8 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,455 mm | 4,931 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,875 mm (better) | 1,960 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,075 mm (better) | 2,077 mm |
| Height | 1,615 mm | 1,474 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.4 m | 10 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 525 mm spare (better) | 440 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 440 L | 457 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1338 L (better) | 1290 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 18 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 1,500 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
BYD ATTO 3
MG IM5
| Specification | BYD ATTO 3 EVO Design RWD | MG IM5 75 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.93m+476mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.96m+85mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.08m | 2.08m+2mm |
| Height | 1.61m | 1.47m-141mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.72m | 2.95m+230mm |
| Ground Clearance | 180mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 440L | 457L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1338L (better) | 1290L |
| Frunk | Not available | 18L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.4m | 9.98m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,750kg (better) | 2,180kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 1,500kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 74.8kWh | 75kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 317 mi (better) | 304 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 220kW (better) | 153kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £38,990 (better) | £39,450 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Saloon |
| Available | 2026+ | 2025+ |
* MG IM5: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 317 miles (better) | 304 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 263 miles (better) | 217 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 35 min (better) | 65 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 220 kW (better) | 153 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 147 Wh/km (better) | 175 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 74.8 kWh (better) | 73.5 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard | Standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 5.5 sec (better) | 6.8 sec |
| Power | 230 kW (better) | 217 kW |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 450 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

BYD ATTO 3
EVO Design RWD

MG IM5
75 Standard Range
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
MG IM5 75 Standard Range
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 250,000 km (better) | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
BYD ATTO 3
MG IM5
The BYD ATTO 3 is £460 cheaper to buy. The BYD ATTO 3 is cheaper to charge, roughly £160 a year versus £192 for the MG IM5, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the BYD ATTO 3 comes out roughly £620 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 263 miles for the BYD ATTO 3 and 217 miles for the MG IM5 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The BYD ATTO 3 goes roughly 46 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 35 minutes in the BYD ATTO 3 and 65 in the MG IM5, so the BYD ATTO 3 loses less time at each stop. That makes the BYD ATTO 3 the stronger long-distance car.
The BYD ATTO 3 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 85 mm narrower than the MG IM5. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 525 mm of total clearance for the BYD ATTO 3 and about 440 mm of total clearance for the MG IM5. The MG IM5 also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the BYD ATTO 3 and 90% for the MG IM5. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use LFP-type cells, which are happy charged to 100% every day. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More BYD ATTO 3 comparisons
More MG IM5 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .