In this comparison, BYD ATTO 2 leads on motorway range, while the Suzuki e VITARA leads on value for money, family practicality and charging speed.
Choose the BYD ATTO 2 if...
Choose the Suzuki e VITARA if...
Our take
The Suzuki e VITARA leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 2Boost | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £30,850 | £26,249 (better) |
| Official range | 214 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Boot space | 400 L (better) | 310 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 45 min |
| 0-62 mph | 7.9 sec (better) | 9.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 2Boost | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,275 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,830 mm | 1,800 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,060 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,675 mm | 1,635 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m | 10.4 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 570 mm spare | 600 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 2Boost | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 400 L (better) | 310 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1340 L (better) | 562 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
BYD ATTO 2
Suzuki e VITARA
| Specification | BYD ATTO 2 Boost | Suzuki e VITARA Motion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.31m | 4.28m-35mm |
| Width | 1.83m | 1.80m-30mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | Not available |
| Height | 1.68m | 1.64m-40mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.62m | 2.70m+80mm |
| Ground Clearance | 165mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 400L (better) | 310L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1340L (better) | 562L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m | 10.4m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,590kg (better) | 1,680kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 51.1kWh (better) | 49kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 214 mi (better) | 213 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 82kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £30,850 | £26,249 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2025+ |
* BYD ATTO 2: Euro NCAP crash-safety rating not published. The vehicle has been assessed under the Green NCAP sustainability programme only.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 2Boost | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 214 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 178 miles (better) | 162 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 45 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 82 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 149 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 45.1 kWh | 49 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 2Boost | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.9 sec (better) | 9.6 sec |
| Power | 130 kW (better) | 106 kW |
| Torque | 290 Nm (better) | 193 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

BYD ATTO 2
Boost

Suzuki e VITARA
Motion 49kWh
6.3/10
average across 4 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
BYD ATTO 2 Boost
Euro NCAP crash-safety rating not published. The vehicle has been assessed under the Green NCAP sustainability programme only.
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 2Boost | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 250,000 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
BYD ATTO 2
Suzuki e VITARA
The BYD ATTO 2 costs £4,601 more than the Suzuki e VITARA. For that premium it adds 90 litres more boot space and a 1.7s quicker 0-62mph time. The Suzuki e VITARA is not just cheaper - it also offers 68 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Suzuki e VITARA comes out ahead overall.
The Suzuki e VITARA is £4,601 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Suzuki e VITARA comes out roughly £4,601 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 178 miles for the BYD ATTO 2 and 162 miles for the Suzuki e VITARA - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The BYD ATTO 2 goes roughly 17 miles further between charging stops.
The Suzuki e VITARA is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 30 mm narrower than the BYD ATTO 2. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Suzuki e VITARA and about 570 mm of total clearance for the BYD ATTO 2.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the BYD ATTO 2 and 90% for the Suzuki e VITARA. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use LFP-type cells, which are happy charged to 100% every day. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More BYD ATTO 2 comparisons
More Suzuki e VITARA comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .