In this comparison, Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads on motorway range, family practicality and running costs, while the Omoda E5 leads on city driving.
Choose the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron if...
Choose the Omoda E5 if...
Our take
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
e-tron 204PS
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron 204PS | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £48,160 | £33,065 (better) |
| Official range | 274 miles (better) | 267 miles |
| Boot space | 535 L (better) | 380 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 28 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 7.2 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron 204PS | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,588 mm | 4,424 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,865 mm | 1,830 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,108 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,614 mm | 1,588 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.2 m (better) | 10.8 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 535 mm spare | 570 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron 204PS | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 535 L (better) | 380 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L (better) | 1075 L |
| Specification | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron 204PS | Omoda E5 Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.42m-164mm |
| Width | 1.86m | 1.83m-35mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.11m | Not available |
| Height | 1.61m | 1.59m-26mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.76m | 2.63m-134mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 147mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 535L (better) | 380L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L (better) | 1075L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.2m (better) | 10.8m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,940kg | 1,710kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 63kWh (better) | 61kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 274 mi (better) | 267 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 160kW (better) | 130kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £48,160 | £33,065 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Coupe SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron 204PS | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 274 miles (better) | 267 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 229 miles (better) | 194 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 28 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 160 kW (better) | 130 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 160 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 59 kWh | 60 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron 204PS | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 7.2 sec (better) |
| Power | 150 kW | 155 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 288 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
e-tron 204PS

Omoda E5
Knight
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron 204PS | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Omoda E5
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron costs £15,095 more than the Omoda E5. For that premium it adds 30 kW faster peak rapid charging and 155 litres more boot space. The Omoda E5 is not just cheaper - it also offers a 0.9s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron comes out ahead overall.
The Omoda E5 is £15,095 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Omoda E5 comes out roughly £15,015 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 229 miles for the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and 194 miles for the Omoda E5 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes roughly 34 miles further between charging stops.
The Omoda E5 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 35 mm narrower than the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 570 mm of total clearance for the Omoda E5 and about 535 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron also turns in a 0.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and 90% for the Omoda E5. That gives the Omoda E5 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Omoda E5's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron comparisons
More Omoda E5 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Audi Q4 e-tron buyer’s guide: every version and battery explained, the 2021-2023 cars vs the 2024 update, the brake-software recall, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay, used vs new, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Omoda E5 buyer’s guide: the 2024-25 car vs the 2026 update with faster charging, the wheel hub nut recall, the 7-year warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .