In this comparison, Audi Q4 e-tron leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed, while the MG IM5 counters with the lowest price.
Choose the Audi Q4 e-tron if...
Our take
The Audi Q4 e-tron wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £46,260 | £39,450 (better) |
| Official range | 274 miles | 304 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 520 L (better) | 457 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 65 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 6.8 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,588 mm | 4,931 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,865 mm (better) | 1,960 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,108 mm | 2,077 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,632 mm | 1,474 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.2 m | 10 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 535 mm spare (better) | 440 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 520 L (better) | 457 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1490 L (better) | 1290 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 18 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,500 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
MG IM5
| Specification | Audi Q4 e-tron e-tron 204PS | MG IM5 75 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.93m+343mm |
| Width | 1.86m | 1.96m+95mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.11m | 2.08m-31mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.47m-158mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.76m | 2.95m+186mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 520L (better) | 457L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1490L (better) | 1290L |
| Frunk | Not available | 18L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.2m | 9.98m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,940kg (better) | 2,180kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,500kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 63kWh | 75kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 274 mi | 304 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 160kW (better) | 153kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £46,260 | £39,450 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Saloon |
| Available | 2026+ | 2025+ |
* MG IM5: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 274 miles | 304 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 229 miles (better) | 217 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 65 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 160 kW (better) | 153 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 175 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 59 kWh | 73.5 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 6.8 sec (better) |
| Power | 150 kW | 217 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 450 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Audi Q4 e-tron
e-tron 204PS

MG IM5
75 Standard Range
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
MG IM5 75 Standard Range
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | MG IM575 Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Audi Q4 e-tron
MG IM5
The Audi Q4 e-tron costs £6,810 more than the MG IM5. For that premium it adds 63 litres more boot space. The MG IM5 is not just cheaper - it also offers 30 miles more WLTP range, 67 kW more power and a 1.3s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Audi Q4 e-tron comes out ahead overall.
The MG IM5 is £6,810 cheaper to buy. The Audi Q4 e-tron is cheaper to charge, roughly £160 a year versus £192 for the MG IM5, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the MG IM5 comes out roughly £6,650 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 229 miles for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 217 miles for the MG IM5 - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV.
The Audi Q4 e-tron is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 95 mm narrower than the MG IM5. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 535 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q4 e-tron and about 440 mm of total clearance for the MG IM5.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 90% for the MG IM5. That gives the MG IM5 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The MG IM5's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Audi Q4 e-tron's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q4 e-tron comparisons
More MG IM5 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .