In this comparison, Skoda Epiq leads on motorway range and running costs, while the Suzuki e VITARA stays competitive across the board.
Choose the Skoda Epiq if...
Our take
The Skoda Epiq edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £24,950 (better) | £26,249 |
| Official range | 190 miles | 213 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 475 L (better) | 310 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 28 min (better) | 45 min |
| 0-62 mph | 9.8 sec | 9.6 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,200 mm | 4,275 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,798 mm (better) | 1,800 mm |
| Height | 1,581 mm | 1,635 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.7 m | 10.4 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 602 mm spare (better) | 600 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 475 L (better) | 310 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1345 L (better) | 562 L |
| Frunk | 25 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,200 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Skoda Epiq
Suzuki e VITARA
| Specification | Skoda Epiq SE L 40 | Suzuki e VITARA Motion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.20m | 4.28m+75mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.80m+2mm |
| Height | 1.58m | 1.64m+54mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.60m | 2.70m+99mm |
| Ground Clearance | 125mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 475L (better) | 310L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1345L (better) | 562L |
| Frunk | 25L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.68m | 10.4m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,542kg (better) | 1,680kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1,200kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 38.5kWh | 49kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 190 mi | 213 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 90kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £24,950 (better) | £26,249 |
| Price after EV grant | £23,450 (-£1,500) | £26,249 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 190 miles | 213 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 158 miles | 162 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 28 min (better) | 45 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 90 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 149 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 37 kWh | 49 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9.8 sec | 9.6 sec (better) |
| Power | 99 kW | 106 kW (better) |
| Torque | 267 Nm (better) | 193 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Skoda Epiq
SE L 40
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Suzuki e VITARA
Motion 49kWh
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Skoda Epiq
Suzuki e VITARA
The Suzuki e VITARA costs £1,299 more than the Skoda Epiq. For that premium it adds 60 kW faster peak rapid charging. The Skoda Epiq is not just cheaper - it also offers 165 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Epiq comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Epiq is £1,299 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £136 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Epiq comes out roughly £1,419 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 158 miles for the Skoda Epiq and 162 miles for the Suzuki e VITARA - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 28 minutes in the Skoda Epiq and 45 in the Suzuki e VITARA, so the Skoda Epiq loses less time at each stop.
The two are within 2 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 602 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Epiq and about 600 mm of total clearance for the Suzuki e VITARA.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Skoda Epiq and 90% for the Suzuki e VITARA. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use LFP-type cells, which are happy charged to 100% every day.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Skoda Epiq comparisons
More Suzuki e VITARA comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .