In this comparison, Renault Megane leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality, while the Skoda Enyaq stays competitive across the board.
Choose the Renault Megane if...
Our take
The Renault Megane wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £31,995 (better) | £39,010 |
| Official range | 306 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Boot space | 440 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 24 min | 24 min |
| 0-62 mph | 7.6 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,200 mm | 4,658 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,768 mm (better) | 1,879 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,017 mm (better) | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,505 mm | 1,622 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.4 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 632 mm spare (better) | 521 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 440 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1332 L | 1710 L (better) |
| Frunk | 0 L | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,000 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Renault Megane
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Renault Megane Techno 67kWh | Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.20m | 4.66m+458mm |
| Width | 1.77m | 1.88m+111mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.02m | 2.15m+131mm |
| Height | 1.50m | 1.62m+117mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.69m | 2.77m+81mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 440L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1332L | 1710L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.4m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,772kg (better) | 2,084kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,000kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 67kWh (better) | 63kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 306 mi (better) | 269 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 165kW | 165kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £31,995 (better) | £39,010 |
| Price after EV grant | £28,245 (-£3,750) (better) | £37,510 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 306 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 255 miles (better) | 224 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 24 min | 24 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 165 kW | 165 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 67 kWh (better) | 59 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard (better) | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.6 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
| Power | 160 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 310 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | Not available | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Renault Megane
Techno 67kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2022
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Renault MeganeTechno 67kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Renault Megane
Skoda Enyaq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Renault Megane
Skoda Enyaq
No active listings.
The Skoda Enyaq costs £7,015 more than the Renault Megane. For that premium it adds 145 litres more boot space. The Renault Megane is not just cheaper - it also offers 37 miles more WLTP range. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Renault Megane comes out ahead overall.
The Renault Megane is £7,015 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Renault Megane comes out roughly £7,055 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 255 miles for the Renault Megane and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Renault Megane goes roughly 30 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-24 minutes.
The Renault Megane is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 111 mm narrower than the Skoda Enyaq. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 632 mm of total clearance for the Renault Megane and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.1 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Renault Megane and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That gives the Renault Megane a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Renault Megane's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Skoda Enyaq's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Renault Megane comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .