Peugeot e-308 SW vs Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq costs £6,745 more than the Peugeot e-308 SW. For that premium it adds 80 litres more boot space, 35 kW more power and a 1.8s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.

The Peugeot e-308 SW is £6,745 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Peugeot e-308 SW comes out roughly £6,825 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.

EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 229 miles for the Peugeot e-308 SW and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV.

The two are within 27 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 548 mm of total clearance for the Peugeot e-308 SW and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.8 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.

Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Peugeot e-308 SW and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.