Peugeot e-2008 vs Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq costs £9,445 more than the Peugeot e-2008. For that premium it adds 65 kW faster peak rapid charging, 151 litres more boot space and 35 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.

The Peugeot e-2008 is £9,445 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Peugeot e-2008 comes out roughly £9,485 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.

EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 205 miles for the Peugeot e-2008 and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 19 miles further between charging stops.

The Peugeot e-2008 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 109 mm narrower than the Skoda Enyaq. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 630 mm of total clearance for the Peugeot e-2008 and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.1 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.

Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Peugeot e-2008 and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.