Loading comparison
KGM Torres EVX vs Skoda Enyaq
Selected trimK30Change trim287 mi · 73.4 kWh · £36,995
At a glance
In this comparison, KGM Torres EVX leads on value for money and family practicality, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on motorway range, charging speed and running costs.
Which should you choose?
Choose the KGM Torres EVX if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you have a family - it has the best combination of boot space, safety, and rear legroom
Choose the Skoda Enyaq if...
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you need the fastest charging of these options
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 2p per mile on off-peak electricity
- you drive in the city - it's compact with an excellent turning circle
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
ValueKGM
KGM
7
Skoda
6.3
Motorway RangeSkoda
KGM
3.9
Skoda
5.3
FamilyKGM
KGM
8.9
Skoda
8
ChargingSkoda
KGM
0
Skoda
6.3
Cost Per MileSkoda
KGM
4.3
Skoda
6.5
City DrivingSkoda
KGM
3.8
Skoda
5.9
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
KGM Torres EVX
K30
- £2,015 cheaper
- 254 litres more boot space
- 500 kg more towing capacity
- 2 more years of battery warranty
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | KGM Torres EVXK30 | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £36,995 (better) | £39,010 |
| Official range | 287 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Boot space | 839 L (better) | 585 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 24 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 8.1 sec |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
KGM Torres EVX
Skoda Enyaq
Length
KGM Torres EVX4,715mm
Skoda Enyaq4,658mm-57mm
Width
KGM Torres EVX1,890mm
Skoda Enyaq1,879mm-11mm
Height
KGM Torres EVX1,725mm
Skoda Enyaq1,622mm-103mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | KGM Torres EVXK30 | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,715 mm | 4,658 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,890 mm | 1,879 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,725 mm | 1,622 mm |
| Turning circle | Not available | 9.3 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 510 mm spare | 521 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | KGM Torres EVXK30 | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 839 L (better) | 585 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1662 L | 1710 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,500 kg (better) | 1,000 kg |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
KGM Torres EVX
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Enyaq
- Boot space of 585 L is bigger than 85% of SUVs we track.
- 9.3 m turning circle, tighter than 100% of SUVs in our database.
Full specifications
| Specification |  KGM Torres EVX K30 |  Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.71m | 4.66m-57mm |
| Width | 1.89m | 1.88m-11mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.15m |
| Height | 1.73m | 1.62m-103mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.68m | 2.77m+86mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 839L (better) | 585L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1662L | 1710L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | Not available | 9.3m |
| Kerb Weight | Not available | 2,084kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1,500kg (better) | 1,000kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 73.4kWh (better) | 63kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 287 mi (better) | 269 mi |
| Max DC Charge | Not available | 165kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £36,995 (better) | £39,010 |
| Price after EV grant | £35,495 (-£1,500) (better) | £37,510 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2025+ |
* KGM Torres EVX: Manufacturer UK site does not list dimensions; figures verified from multiple independent sources.
* KGM Torres EVX: Up to 287 miles WLTP as quoted by the manufacturer.
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | KGM Torres EVXK30 | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 287 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 239 miles (better) | 224 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 24 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | Not available | 165 kW |
| Home AC charging | Not available | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 73.4 kWh (better) | 59 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | KGM Torres EVXK30 | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 8.1 sec |
| Power | 152 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Torque | 339 Nm (better) | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
KGM Torres EVX
K30
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews
- Auto Express4.5/5
- DrivingElectric4.5/5
- Parkers4.3/5
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Skoda Enyaq SE L 60
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant90%
Child Occupant87%
Vulnerable Road Users77%
Safety Assist78%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | KGM Torres EVXK30 | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 10 years (better) | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 1,000,000 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Buying options
Get a quote
KGM Torres EVX
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Skoda Enyaq
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the Skoda Enyaq worth the extra £2,015 over the KGM Torres EVX?
The Skoda Enyaq costs £2,015 more than the KGM Torres EVX. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The KGM Torres EVX is not just cheaper - it also offers 254 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the KGM Torres EVX or the Skoda Enyaq?
The KGM Torres EVX is £2,015 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the KGM Torres EVX comes out roughly £1,935 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the KGM Torres EVX and Skoda Enyaq like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 239 miles for the KGM Torres EVX and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The KGM Torres EVX goes roughly 15 miles further between charging stops.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the KGM Torres EVX or the Skoda Enyaq?
The two are within 11 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq and about 510 mm of total clearance for the KGM Torres EVX.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the KGM Torres EVX or the Skoda Enyaq?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the KGM Torres EVX and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That gives the KGM Torres EVX a modest edge in retained real-world range. The KGM Torres EVX's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Skoda Enyaq's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. The KGM Torres EVX has the longer battery warranty at 10 years, versus 8 for the Skoda Enyaq.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More KGM Torres EVX comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the KGM Torres EVX and Skoda Enyaq rank among the cheapest EVs after the grantWhere the KGM Torres EVX and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best family EVsWhere the KGM Torres EVX and Skoda Enyaq rank among EVs under £40,000Where the KGM Torres EVX and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the KGM Torres EVX and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the KGM Torres EVX and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best city EVs
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .