In this comparison, Hyundai KONA Electric leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality, while the Skoda Epiq leads on charging speed and city driving.
Choose the Hyundai KONA Electric if...
Choose the Skoda Epiq if...
Our take
The Hyundai KONA Electric leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA ElectricAdvance | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,000 | £24,950 (better) |
| Official range | 319 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Boot space | 466 L | 475 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 41 min | 28 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 7.8 sec (better) | 9.8 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA ElectricAdvance | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,355 mm | 4,200 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,825 mm | 1,798 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,100 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,580 mm | 1,581 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.6 m (better) | 10.7 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 575 mm spare | 602 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA ElectricAdvance | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 466 L | 475 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1300 L | 1345 L (better) |
| Frunk | 27 L (better) | 25 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 1,200 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Hyundai KONA Electric
Skoda Epiq
| Specification | Hyundai KONA Electric Advance | Skoda Epiq SE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.36m | 4.20m-155mm |
| Width | 1.82m | 1.80m-27mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.10m | Not available |
| Height | 1.58m | 1.58m+1mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.66m | 2.60m-59mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 125mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 466L | 475L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1300L | 1345L (better) |
| Frunk | 27L (better) | 25L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.6m (better) | 10.68m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,747kg | 1,542kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 1,200kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 65.4kWh (better) | 38.5kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 319 mi (better) | 190 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 101kW (better) | 90kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,000 | £24,950 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £31,250 (-£3,750) | £23,450 (-£1,500) (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2023+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA ElectricAdvance | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 319 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 266 miles (better) | 158 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 41 min | 28 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 101 kW (better) | 90 kW |
| Home AC charging | 10.4 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 65.4 kWh (better) | 37 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Standard (better) | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA ElectricAdvance | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.8 sec (better) | 9.8 sec |
| Power | 160 kW (better) | 99 kW |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 267 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Hyundai KONA Electric
Advance

Skoda Epiq
SE L 40
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA ElectricAdvance | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Hyundai KONA Electric
Skoda Epiq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Hyundai KONA Electric
Skoda Epiq
No active listings.
The Hyundai KONA Electric costs £10,050 more than the Skoda Epiq. For that premium it adds 129 miles more WLTP range, 61 kW more power and a 2.0s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Hyundai KONA Electric comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Epiq is £10,050 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £136 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Epiq comes out roughly £10,050 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 266 miles for the Hyundai KONA Electric and 158 miles for the Skoda Epiq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Hyundai KONA Electric goes roughly 108 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 41 minutes in the Hyundai KONA Electric and 28 in the Skoda Epiq, so the Skoda Epiq loses less time at each stop. So the Hyundai KONA Electric stops less often while the Skoda Epiq stops for less time - pick on which you would rather do.
The two are within 27 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 602 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Epiq and about 575 mm of total clearance for the Hyundai KONA Electric.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 86% battery health for the Hyundai KONA Electric and 90% for the Skoda Epiq. That gives the Skoda Epiq a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Skoda Epiq's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Hyundai KONA Electric's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Hyundai KONA Electric comparisons
More Skoda Epiq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .