Loading comparison
GWM ORA ORA 03 vs MINI Aceman
Selected trimPUREChange trim192 mi · 48 kWh · £21,245
Selected trimEChange trim191 mi · 38.5 kWh · £28,310
At a glance
In this comparison, GWM ORA ORA 03 leads on value for money, while the MINI Aceman leads on running costs and city driving.
Which should you choose?
Choose the GWM ORA ORA 03 if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
Choose the MINI Aceman if...
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.7p per mile on off-peak electricity
- you need the best car for city driving and tight parking
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The MINI Aceman edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
ValueGWM ORA
GWM ORA
6.4
MINI
5.7
Motorway Range
GWM ORA
3.5
MINI
3.9
Too close to call
Family
GWM ORA
5
MINI
4.7
Too close to call
Cost Per MileMINI
GWM ORA
4.7
MINI
9.3
City DrivingMINI
GWM ORA
6.7
MINI
8.1
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
MINI Aceman
E
- 72 litres more boot space
- 14 min quicker 10-80% rapid charge
- 0.4 m tighter turning circle
- 750 kg more towing capacity
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03PURE | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £21,245 (better) | £28,310 |
| Official range | 192 miles (better) | 191 miles |
| Boot space | 228 L | 300 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 43 min | 29 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 13.4 sec | 12.7 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
GWM ORA ORA 03
MINI Aceman
Length
GWM ORA ORA 034,235mm
MINI Aceman4,079mm-156mm
Width
GWM ORA ORA 031,825mm
MINI Aceman1,754mm-71mm
Height
GWM ORA ORA 031,603mm
MINI Aceman1,514mm-89mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03PURE | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,235 mm | 4,079 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,825 mm | 1,754 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 1,984 mm |
| Height | 1,603 mm | 1,514 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.2 m | 10.8 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 575 mm spare | 646 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03PURE | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 822 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 228 L | 300 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 858 L | 1005 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 750 kg (better) |
Full specifications
| Specification |  GWM ORA ORA 03 PURE |  MINI Aceman E |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.24m | 4.08m-156mm |
| Width | 1.82m | 1.75m-71mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 1.98m |
| Height | 1.60m | 1.51m-89mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.65m | 2.61m-44mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 228L | 300L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 858L | 1005L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 822mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.2m | 10.8m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,540kg (better) | 1,720kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 48kWh (better) | 38.5kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 192 mi (better) | 191 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 64kW | 75kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £21,245 (better) | £28,310 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2024+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03PURE | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 192 miles (better) | 191 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 160 miles (better) | 159 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 43 min | 29 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 64 kW | 75 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 6.6 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 48 kWh (better) | 38.5 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03PURE | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 13.4 sec | 12.7 sec (better) |
| Power | 126 kW | 135 kW (better) |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 290 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
GWM ORA ORA 03
PURE
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
MINI Aceman
E
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
GWM ORA ORA 03
All 3 videos
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - GWM ORA ORA 03 PURE
Tested 2022
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - MINI Aceman E
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant83%
Child Occupant87%
Vulnerable Road Users77%
Safety Assist79%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03PURE | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Buying options
Get a quote
GWM ORA ORA 03
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
MINI Aceman
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the MINI Aceman worth the extra £7,065 over the GWM ORA ORA 03?
The MINI Aceman costs £7,065 more than the GWM ORA ORA 03. For that premium it adds 72 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the MINI Aceman comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the GWM ORA ORA 03 or the MINI Aceman?
The GWM ORA ORA 03 is £7,065 cheaper to buy. The MINI Aceman is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £168 for the GWM ORA ORA 03, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the GWM ORA ORA 03 comes out roughly £6,905 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the GWM ORA ORA 03 and MINI Aceman like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 160 miles for the GWM ORA ORA 03 and 159 miles for the MINI Aceman - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 43 minutes in the GWM ORA ORA 03 and 29 in the MINI Aceman, so the MINI Aceman loses less time at each stop.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the GWM ORA ORA 03 or the MINI Aceman?
The MINI Aceman is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 71 mm narrower than the GWM ORA ORA 03. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 646 mm of total clearance for the MINI Aceman and about 575 mm of total clearance for the GWM ORA ORA 03. The MINI Aceman also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the GWM ORA ORA 03 or the MINI Aceman?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the GWM ORA ORA 03 and 84% for the MINI Aceman. That gives the GWM ORA ORA 03 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The GWM ORA ORA 03's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the MINI Aceman's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More GWM ORA ORA 03 comparisons
More MINI Aceman comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the GWM ORA ORA 03 and MINI Aceman rank among the best family EVsWhere the GWM ORA ORA 03 and MINI Aceman rank among EVs under £30,000Where the GWM ORA ORA 03 and MINI Aceman rank among EVs under £40,000Where the GWM ORA ORA 03 and MINI Aceman rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the GWM ORA ORA 03 and MINI Aceman rank among the best city EVsWhere the GWM ORA ORA 03 and MINI Aceman rank among the cheapest EVs to run
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .