In this comparison, Ford Puma Gen-E stays competitive across the board, while the VW ID.Polo leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed.
Choose the VW ID.Polo if...
Our take
The VW ID.Polo leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Select
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW ID.PoloLife 116PS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,995 | £23,945 (better) |
| Official range | 259 miles (better) | 204 miles |
| Boot space | 566 L (better) | 441 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 26 min | 23 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | Not available |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW ID.PoloLife 116PS |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,313 mm | 4,053 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,805 mm (better) | 1,816 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,930 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,555 mm | 1,530 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m (better) | 10.9 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 595 mm spare (better) | 584 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW ID.PoloLife 116PS |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 786 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 566 L (better) | 441 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1283 L (better) | 1240 L |
| Frunk | 43 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Puma Gen-E
VW ID.Polo
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Ford Puma Gen-E Select | VW ID.Polo Life 116PS |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.31m | 4.05m-260mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.82m+11mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.93m | Not available |
| Height | 1.55m | 1.53m-25mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.59m | 2.59m+4mm |
| Ground Clearance | 157mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 566L (better) | 441L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1283L (better) | 1240L |
| Frunk | 43L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 786mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m (better) | 10.9m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,563kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46.8kWh (better) | 37kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 259 mi (better) | 204 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 90kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,995 | £23,945 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £26,245 (-£3,750) | £23,945 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Hatchback |
| Available | 2026+ | 2027+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW ID.PoloLife 116PS |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 259 miles (better) | 204 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 186 miles (better) | 170 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 26 min | 23 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 90 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | Not available |
| Energy consumption | 130 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 46.8 kWh (better) | 37 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW ID.PoloLife 116PS |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | Not available |
| Power | 124 kW (better) | 85 kW |
| Torque | 290 Nm | Not available |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Ford Puma Gen-E
Select

VW ID.Polo
Life 116PS
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW ID.PoloLife 116PS |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Ford Puma Gen-E
VW ID.Polo
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Puma Gen-E
VW ID.Polo
No active listings.
The Ford Puma Gen-E costs £6,050 more than the VW ID.Polo. For that premium it adds 55 miles more WLTP range, 125 litres more boot space and 39 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the VW ID.Polo comes out ahead overall.
The VW ID.Polo is £6,050 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £120 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the VW ID.Polo comes out roughly £6,170 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 186 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 170 miles for the VW ID.Polo - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Ford Puma Gen-E goes roughly 16 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 23-26 minutes.
The two are within 11 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E and about 584 mm of total clearance for the VW ID.Polo. The Ford Puma Gen-E also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
More VW ID.Polo comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .