In this comparison, Ford Puma Gen-E leads on charging speed, running costs and city driving, while the Toyota Proace City Verso Electric leads on value for money.
Best value
Toyota Proace City Verso ElectricRange & charging
Ford Puma Gen-EPracticality
Ford Puma Gen-EChoose the Ford Puma Gen-E if...
Choose the Toyota Proace City Verso Electric if...
Our take
The Ford Puma Gen-E leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Proace City Verso ElectricM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,995 (better) | £31,995 |
| Official range | 259 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Boot space | 566 L | 775 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 26 min | Not available |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | Not available |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Proace City Verso ElectricM |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,313 mm | 4,405 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,805 mm (better) | 1,848 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,930 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,555 mm | 1,844 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m (better) | 10.8 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 595 mm spare (better) | 552 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Proace City Verso ElectricM |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 786 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 566 L | 775 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1283 L | Not available |
| Frunk | 43 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Toyota Proace City Verso Electric
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Ford Puma Gen-E Select | Toyota Proace City Verso Electric M |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.31m | 4.41m+92mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.85m+43mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.93m | Not available |
| Height | 1.55m | 1.84m+289mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.59m | 2.79m+197mm |
| Ground Clearance | 157mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 566L | 775L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1283L | Not available |
| Frunk | 43L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 786mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m (better) | 10.8m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,563kg (better) | 1,780kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46.8kWh | 50kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 259 mi (better) | 213 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 100kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,995 (better) | £31,995 |
| Price after EV grant | £26,245 (-£3,750) (better) | £30,495 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | MPV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Proace City Verso ElectricM |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 259 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 186 miles (better) | 178 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 26 min | Not available |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 100 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7 kW |
| Energy consumption | 130 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 46.8 kWh | 50 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Proace City Verso ElectricM |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | Not available |
| Power | 124 kW (better) | 100 kW |
| Torque | 290 Nm (better) | 260 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Ford Puma Gen-E
Select

Toyota Proace City Verso Electric
M
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2018
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Proace City Verso ElectricM |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Ford Puma Gen-E
Toyota Proace City Verso Electric
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Toyota Proace City Verso Electric
No active listings.
The Toyota Proace City Verso Electric costs £2,000 more than the Ford Puma Gen-E. For that premium it adds 209 litres more boot space. The Ford Puma Gen-E is not just cheaper - it also offers 46 miles more WLTP range. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Puma Gen-E is £2,000 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out roughly £2,080 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 186 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 178 miles for the Toyota Proace City Verso Electric - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV.
The Ford Puma Gen-E is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 43 mm narrower than the Toyota Proace City Verso Electric. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E and about 552 mm of total clearance for the Toyota Proace City Verso Electric. The Ford Puma Gen-E also turns in a 0.3 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 84% for the Toyota Proace City Verso Electric. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
More Toyota Proace City Verso Electric comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Ford Puma Gen-E buyer’s guide: the 43 kWh launch car vs the 2026 46.8 kWh update, real-world range, recalls, warranty left, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used buyer’s guide to the electric Citroën ë-Berlingo, Peugeot e-Rifter, Vauxhall Combo-e Life and Toyota Proace City Verso: the 50 kWh and 52 kWh generations, recalls, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .