In this comparison, Ford Puma Gen-E leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed, while the Suzuki e VITARA counters with the lowest price.
Choose the Ford Puma Gen-E if...
Our take
The Ford Puma Gen-E leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Select
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,995 | £26,249 (better) |
| Official range | 259 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Boot space | 566 L (better) | 310 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 26 min (better) | 45 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 9.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,313 mm | 4,275 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,805 mm | 1,800 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,930 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,555 mm | 1,635 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m | 10.4 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 595 mm spare | 600 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 786 mm | Not available |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 566 L (better) | 310 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1283 L (better) | 562 L |
| Frunk | 43 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Suzuki e VITARA
| Specification | Ford Puma Gen-E Select | Suzuki e VITARA Motion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.31m | 4.28m-38mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.80m-5mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.93m | Not available |
| Height | 1.55m | 1.64m+80mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.59m | 2.70m+112mm |
| Ground Clearance | 157mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 566L (better) | 310L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1283L (better) | 562L |
| Frunk | 43L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 786mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m | 10.4m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,563kg (better) | 1,680kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46.8kWh | 49kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 259 mi (better) | 213 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,995 | £26,249 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £26,245 (-£3,750) | £26,249 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 259 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 186 miles (better) | 162 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 26 min (better) | 45 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 130 Wh/km (better) | 149 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 46.8 kWh | 49 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 9.6 sec |
| Power | 124 kW (better) | 106 kW |
| Torque | 290 Nm (better) | 193 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Puma Gen-E
Select

Suzuki e VITARA
Motion 49kWh
6.3/10
average across 4 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Ford Puma Gen-E
Suzuki e VITARA
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Suzuki e VITARA
No active listings.
The Ford Puma Gen-E costs £3,746 more than the Suzuki e VITARA. For that premium it adds 46 miles more WLTP range, 256 litres more boot space and a 1.6s quicker 0-62mph time. The Suzuki e VITARA is not just cheaper - it also offers 50 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out ahead overall.
The Suzuki e VITARA is £3,746 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Suzuki e VITARA comes out roughly £3,666 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 186 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 162 miles for the Suzuki e VITARA - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Ford Puma Gen-E goes roughly 25 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 26 minutes in the Ford Puma Gen-E and 45 in the Suzuki e VITARA, so the Ford Puma Gen-E loses less time at each stop. That makes the Ford Puma Gen-E the stronger long-distance car.
The two are within 5 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Suzuki e VITARA and about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 90% for the Suzuki e VITARA. That gives the Suzuki e VITARA a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Suzuki e VITARA's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Ford Puma Gen-E's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
More Suzuki e VITARA comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .