Loading comparison
Ford E-Tourneo Courier vs Skoda Epiq
Selected trimTitaniumChange trim196 mi · 46 kWh · £33,690
At a glance
In this comparison, Ford E-Tourneo Courier leads on family practicality and charging speed, while the Skoda Epiq leads on running costs and city driving.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Ford E-Tourneo Courier if...
- you need the most family-friendly option with good safety and space
- you need the fastest charging of these options
Choose the Skoda Epiq if...
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.7p per mile on off-peak electricity
- you need the best car for city driving and tight parking
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Skoda Epiq edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Value
Ford
5.4
Skoda
5.5
Too close to call
Motorway Range
Ford
3.6
Skoda
4
Too close to call
FamilyFord
Ford
5.3
Skoda
4.5
ChargingFord
Ford
3.7
Skoda
3.2
Cost Per MileSkoda
Ford
6.5
Skoda
9.2
City DrivingSkoda
Ford
6.2
Skoda
7.8
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,690 | £24,950 (better) |
| Official range | 196 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Boot space | 570 L (better) | 475 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 35 min | 28 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 11 sec | 9.8 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Ford E-Tourneo Courier
Skoda Epiq
Length
Ford E-Tourneo Courier4,337mm
Skoda Epiq4,200mm-137mm
Width
Ford E-Tourneo Courier1,876mm
Skoda Epiq1,798mm-78mm
Height
Ford E-Tourneo Courier1,817mm
Skoda Epiq1,581mm-236mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,337 mm | 4,200 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,876 mm | 1,798 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,817 mm | 1,581 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.7 m | 10.7 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 524 mm spare | 602 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 570 L (better) | 475 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1345 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 25 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 1,200 kg (better) |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford E-Tourneo Courier
- At 4,337 mm, shorter than 100% of MPVs in our UK catalogue.
- Eligible for the full £3,750 UK Electric Car Grant, one of the few MPVs in our catalogue that qualifies for the top band.
- 10.7 m turning circle, tighter than 100% of MPVs in our database.
Skoda Epiq
- At 4,200 mm, shorter than 90% of SUVs in our UK catalogue.
- One of 33 of 232 UK EVs in our catalogue with V2L (vehicle-to-load) support.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Ford E-Tourneo Courier Titanium |  Skoda Epiq SE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.34m | 4.20m-137mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.80m-78mm |
| Height | 1.82m | 1.58m-236mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.69m | 2.60m-91mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 125mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 570L (better) | 475L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1345L |
| Frunk | Not available | 25L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.7m | 10.68m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,724kg | 1,542kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 1,200kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46kWh (better) | 38.5kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 196 mi (better) | 190 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 90kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,690 | £24,950 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £29,940 (-£3,750) | £23,450 (-£1,500) (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | MPV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2026+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 196 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 163 miles (better) | 158 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 35 min | 28 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 90 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 43.6 kWh (better) | 37 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 11 sec | 9.8 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW (better) | 99 kW |
| Torque | 290 Nm (better) | 267 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
Ford E-Tourneo Courier
Titanium
Skoda Epiq
SE L 40
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Ford E-Tourneo Courier Titanium
Tested 2024
Adult Occupant85%
Child Occupant78%
Vulnerable Road Users78%
Safety Assist66%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | Not available |
Buying options
Get a quote
Ford E-Tourneo Courier
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Skoda Epiq
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ford E-Tourneo Courier worth the extra £8,740 over the Skoda Epiq?
The Ford E-Tourneo Courier costs £8,740 more than the Skoda Epiq. For that premium it adds 95 litres more boot space. The Skoda Epiq is not just cheaper - it also offers a 1.2s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Epiq comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Ford E-Tourneo Courier or the Skoda Epiq?
The Skoda Epiq is £8,740 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £136 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Epiq comes out roughly £8,860 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and Skoda Epiq like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 163 miles for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and 158 miles for the Skoda Epiq - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 28-35 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Ford E-Tourneo Courier or the Skoda Epiq?
The Skoda Epiq is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 78 mm narrower than the Ford E-Tourneo Courier. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 602 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Epiq and about 524 mm of total clearance for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Ford E-Tourneo Courier or the Skoda Epiq?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and 90% for the Skoda Epiq. That gives the Skoda Epiq a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Skoda Epiq's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Ford E-Tourneo Courier's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford E-Tourneo Courier comparisons
More Skoda Epiq comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and Skoda Epiq rank among the cheapest EVs after the grantWhere the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and Skoda Epiq rank among the best family EVsWhere the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and Skoda Epiq rank among EVs under £40,000Where the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and Skoda Epiq rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and Skoda Epiq rank among the best city EVsWhere the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and Skoda Epiq rank among the cheapest EVs to run
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .