Fiat 600e vs MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman costs £1,315 more than the Fiat 600e. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The Fiat 600e is not just cheaper - it also offers 63 miles more WLTP range, 25 kW faster peak rapid charging and 60 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the MINI Aceman comes out ahead overall.

The Fiat 600e is £1,315 cheaper to buy. The MINI Aceman is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £168 for the Fiat 600e, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Fiat 600e comes out roughly £1,155 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.

EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 176 miles for the Fiat 600e and 159 miles for the MINI Aceman - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Fiat 600e goes roughly 17 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 27-29 minutes.

The two are within 25 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 646 mm of total clearance for the MINI Aceman and about 621 mm of total clearance for the Fiat 600e. The Fiat 600e also turns in a 0.3 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.

Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Fiat 600e and 84% for the MINI Aceman. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.