The DS 3 Crossback E-Tense was replaced by the DS 3 E-Tense in 2023. Compare the DS 3 E-Tense with the MINI Aceman
In this comparison, DS 3 Crossback E-Tense stays competitive across the board, while the MINI Aceman leads on running costs.
Best value
Too close to call
Range & charging
Too close to call
Practicality
Too close to call
Choose the MINI Aceman if...
Our take
The MINI Aceman edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | DS 3 Crossback E-TenseBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,490 | £28,310 (better) |
| Official range | 199 miles (better) | 191 miles |
| Boot space | 350 L (better) | 300 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 29 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8.7 sec (better) | 12.7 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | DS 3 Crossback E-TenseBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,118 mm | 4,079 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,790 mm | 1,754 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,012 mm | 1,984 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,534 mm | 1,514 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.7 m (better) | 10.8 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 610 mm spare | 646 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | DS 3 Crossback E-TenseBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 822 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 350 L (better) | 300 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1050 L (better) | 1005 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 750 kg (better) |
| Specification | DS 3 Crossback E-Tense Base | MINI Aceman E |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.12m | 4.08m-39mm |
| Width | 1.79m | 1.75m-36mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.01m | 1.98m-28mm |
| Height | 1.53m | 1.51m-20mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.56m | 2.61m+48mm |
| Ground Clearance | 175mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 350L (better) | 300L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1050L (better) | 1005L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 822mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.7m (better) | 10.8m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,523kg (better) | 1,720kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 50kWh (better) | 38.5kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 199 mi (better) | 191 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 75kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,490 | £28,310 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2019–2023 | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | DS 3 Crossback E-TenseBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 199 miles (better) | 191 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 166 miles (better) | 159 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 29 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 75 kW |
| Home AC charging | 7.4 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 46.3 kWh (better) | 38.5 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | DS 3 Crossback E-TenseBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.7 sec (better) | 12.7 sec |
| Power | 100 kW | 135 kW (better) |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 290 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

DS 3 Crossback E-Tense
Base

MINI Aceman
E
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2019
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | DS 3 Crossback E-TenseBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | Not available |
Get a quote
DS 3 Crossback E-Tense
MINI Aceman
The DS 3 Crossback E-Tense costs £5,180 more than the MINI Aceman. For that premium it adds 25 kW faster peak rapid charging, 50 litres more boot space and a 4.0s quicker 0-62mph time. The MINI Aceman is not just cheaper - it also offers 35 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the MINI Aceman comes out ahead overall.
The MINI Aceman is £5,180 cheaper to buy. The MINI Aceman is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £168 for the DS 3 Crossback E-Tense, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the MINI Aceman comes out roughly £5,340 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 166 miles for the DS 3 Crossback E-Tense and 159 miles for the MINI Aceman - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 29-30 minutes.
The MINI Aceman is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 36 mm narrower than the DS 3 Crossback E-Tense. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 646 mm of total clearance for the MINI Aceman and about 610 mm of total clearance for the DS 3 Crossback E-Tense.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the DS 3 Crossback E-Tense and 84% for the MINI Aceman. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More DS 3 Crossback E-Tense comparisons
More MINI Aceman comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .