In this comparison, Citroën ë-C4 leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed, while the Suzuki e VITARA leads on running costs and city driving.
Choose the Citroën ë-C4 if...
Choose the Suzuki e VITARA if...
Our take
The Citroën ë-C4 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £28,715 | £26,249 (better) |
| Official range | 222 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Boot space | 380 L (better) | 310 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min (better) | 45 min |
| 0-62 mph | 10 sec | 9.6 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,355 mm | 4,275 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,800 mm | 1,800 mm |
| Height | 1,520 mm | 1,635 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m | 10.4 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 600 mm spare | 600 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 380 L (better) | 310 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1250 L (better) | 562 L |
| Frunk | 0 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Citroën ë-C4
Suzuki e VITARA
| Specification | Citroën ë-C4 PLUS | Suzuki e VITARA Motion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.36m | 4.28m-80mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.80m |
| Height | 1.52m | 1.64m+115mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.67m | 2.70m+30mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 380L (better) | 310L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1250L (better) | 562L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m | 10.4m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,571kg (better) | 1,680kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 50kWh (better) | 49kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 222 mi (better) | 213 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £28,715 | £26,249 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £27,215 (-£1,500) | £26,249 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 222 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 161 miles | 162 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min (better) | 45 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.4 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Energy consumption | 153 Wh/km | 149 Wh/km (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 50 kWh (better) | 49 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 10 sec | 9.6 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW | 106 kW (better) |
| Torque | 260 Nm (better) | 193 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Citroën ë-C4
PLUS
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Suzuki e VITARA
Motion 49kWh
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Citroën ë-C4
Suzuki e VITARA
The Citroën ë-C4 costs £2,466 more than the Suzuki e VITARA. For that premium it adds 70 litres more boot space. The Suzuki e VITARA is not just cheaper - it also offers 50 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Citroën ë-C4 comes out ahead overall.
The Suzuki e VITARA is £2,466 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Suzuki e VITARA comes out roughly £2,506 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 161 miles for the Citroën ë-C4 and 162 miles for the Suzuki e VITARA - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 30 minutes in the Citroën ë-C4 and 45 in the Suzuki e VITARA, so the Citroën ë-C4 loses less time at each stop.
The two are within 0 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Citroën ë-C4 and about 600 mm of total clearance for the Suzuki e VITARA. The Suzuki e VITARA also turns in a 0.5 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Citroën ë-C4 and 90% for the Suzuki e VITARA. That gives the Suzuki e VITARA a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Suzuki e VITARA's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Citroën ë-C4's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Citroën ë-C4 comparisons
More Suzuki e VITARA comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .