Loading comparison
Abarth 600e vs Ford Puma Gen-E
Selected trimTurismoChange trim207 mi · 54 kWh · £33,995
Selected trimSelectChange trim259 mi · 46.8 kWh · £29,995
At a glance
In this comparison, Abarth 600e leads on charging speed, while the Ford Puma Gen-E leads on value for money, family practicality and running costs.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Abarth 600e if...
- you need the fastest charging of these options
Choose the Ford Puma Gen-E if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you need the most family-friendly option with good safety and space
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.8p per mile on off-peak electricity
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Ford Puma Gen-E leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
ValueFord
Abarth
3.7
Ford
6.2
Motorway Range
Abarth
4.3
Ford
4.5
Too close to call
FamilyFord
Abarth
3.4
Ford
6.2
ChargingAbarth
Abarth
6.2
Ford
4.1
Cost Per MileFord
Abarth
5.4
Ford
8.8
City Driving
Abarth
8.1
Ford
7.9
Too close to call
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Select
- £4,000 cheaper
- 52 miles more WLTP range
- 206 litres more boot space
- 22 Wh/km more efficient
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,995 | £29,995 (better) |
| Official range | 207 miles | 259 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 360 L | 566 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 27 min | 26 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 6.2 sec (better) | 8 sec |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Abarth 600e
Ford Puma Gen-E
Length
Abarth 600e4,187mm-126mm
Ford Puma Gen-E4,313mm
Width
Abarth 600e1,779mm-26mm
Ford Puma Gen-E1,805mm
Height
Abarth 600e1,557mm
Ford Puma Gen-E1,555mm-2mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,187 mm | 4,313 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,779 mm (better) | 1,805 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,981 mm | 1,930 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,557 mm | 1,555 mm |
| Turning circle | Not available | 10.5 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 621 mm spare (better) | 595 mm spare |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 786 mm |
| Boot space (seats up) | 360 L | 566 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1283 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 43 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 0 kg |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Abarth 600e
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Ford Puma Gen-E
- Eligible for the full £3,750 UK Electric Car Grant, one of 7 SUVs we track that qualifies for the top band.
- Boot space of 566 L is bigger than 80% of SUVs we track.
- At 4,313 mm, shorter than 85% of SUVs in our UK catalogue.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Abarth 600e Turismo |  Ford Puma Gen-E Select |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.19m | 4.31m+126mm |
| Width | 1.78m | 1.80m+26mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.98m | 1.93m-51mm |
| Height | 1.56m | 1.55m-2mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.56m | 2.59m+29mm |
| Ground Clearance | 179mm | 157mm-22mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 360L | 566L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1283L |
| Frunk | Not available | 43L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 786mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | Not available | 10.5m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,640kg | 1,563kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 54kWh (better) | 46.8kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 207 mi | 259 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 100kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,995 | £29,995 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £32,495 (-£1,500) | £26,245 (-£3,750) (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2026+ |
* Abarth 600e: Not yet tested by Euro NCAP.
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 207 miles | 259 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 173 miles | 186 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 27 min | 26 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 100 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 152 Wh/km | 130 Wh/km (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 50.8 kWh (better) | 46.8 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.2 sec (better) | 8 sec |
| Power | 176 kW (better) | 124 kW |
| Torque | 345 Nm (better) | 290 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.
Abarth 600e
Turismo
Ford Puma Gen-E
Select
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Abarth 600e
All 3 videos
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Abarth 600e Turismo
Abarth 600e Turismo
Not yet tested by Euro NCAP.
Euro NCAP - Ford Puma Gen-E Select
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant75%
Child Occupant84%
Vulnerable Road Users70%
Safety Assist69%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,934 km (better) |
Buying options
Get a quote
Abarth 600e
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Ford Puma Gen-E
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Live used listings
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Abarth 600e
No active listings.
Ford Puma Gen-E
- £17,9992026Car360View
- £23,5002026EV ExpertsView
Frequently asked questions
Is the Abarth 600e worth the extra £4,000 over the Ford Puma Gen-E?
The Abarth 600e costs £4,000 more than the Ford Puma Gen-E. For that premium it adds 52 kW more power and a 1.8s quicker 0-62mph time. The Ford Puma Gen-E is not just cheaper - it also offers 52 miles more WLTP range, 206 litres more boot space and lower energy use, 130 versus 152 Wh/km. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Abarth 600e or the Ford Puma Gen-E?
The Ford Puma Gen-E is £4,000 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out roughly £4,120 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Abarth 600e and Ford Puma Gen-E like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 173 miles for the Abarth 600e and 186 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 26-27 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Abarth 600e or the Ford Puma Gen-E?
The two are within 26 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 621 mm of total clearance for the Abarth 600e and about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Abarth 600e or the Ford Puma Gen-E?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Abarth 600e and 84% for the Ford Puma Gen-E. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Abarth 600e comparisons
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Abarth 600e and Ford Puma Gen-E rank among the cheapest EVs after the grantWhere the Abarth 600e and Ford Puma Gen-E rank among the best family EVsWhere the Abarth 600e and Ford Puma Gen-E rank among EVs under £40,000Where the Abarth 600e and Ford Puma Gen-E rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Abarth 600e and Ford Puma Gen-E rank among the best city EVsWhere the Abarth 600e and Ford Puma Gen-E rank among the cheapest EVs to run
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .